EnigmA Amiga Run 1997 July/EnigmA AMIGA RUN 20 (1997)(G.R. Edizioni)(IT)[!][issue 1997-07 & 08][EAR-CD IV].iso/lightwave/lwmlist/95.lightwave-10/001156_owner-lightwav…mail.webcom.com_Thu Oct 19 15:40:37 1995.msg

Internet Message Format | 1995-11-07 | 2KB

Received: by mail.webcom.com
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA212682437; Thu, 19 Oct 1995 15:40:37 -0700
Return-Path: <[e-mail]>
Received: from rsoft.rsoft.bc.ca (mindlink.net) by mail.webcom.com with SMTP
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA212622430; Thu, 19 Oct 1995 15:40:30 -0700
Received: from line155.nwm.mindlink.net by rsoft.rsoft.bc.ca with smtp
    (Smail3.1.28.1 #5) id m0t63WY-0004ArC; Thu, 19 Oct 95 15:33 PDT
Message-Id: <[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 95 15:33 PDT
X-Sender: [e-mail]
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 1.4.4
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: [e-mail]
From: [e-mail] ([e-mail])
Subject: Re: Another LW bug!
Sender: [e-mail]
Precedence: bulk

>Daniel J. McCoy wrote:
---Snip---
>While I applaud both Stuart and Allen for their tremendous efforts (I'm
>forever impressed at LightWave and that only two people are primarily
>responsible), I sincerely hope the LightWave project managers take a very
>close look at the beta program they currently have.  Don't stop at just
>giving beta releases to key individuals/groups that need new features.
>Expand the beta program to include others that do NOT depend on these new
>features to keep 'em going but can spend the time testing everything they
>can.
---Snip---

Correct me if I'm wrong, but haven't we ALL been (& continue to be) Newtek
Beta testers???

DC

--
[e-mail] ([e-mail]) sent this message.
To Post a Message           : [e-mail]
Un/Subscription Requests To : [e-mail]
(DIGEST)                 or : [e-mail]
Administrative Items To     : [e-mail]